Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs RDLCX
GAFFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$87.43
Change-$1.96 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.69
Change-$0.24 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.01M
GAFFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. RDLCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and RDLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. RDLCX (313M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GAFFX (0.56) vs RDLCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GAFFX (9 years) vs RDLCX (19 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). RDLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: RDLCX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.29 vs. RDLCX (5.71). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.94 vs. RDLCX (5.60).
| GAFFX | RDLCX | GAFFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.81 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.92 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.035 | 18.675 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 313M | 108,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.29 | 5.71 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.27 | 47.90 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.94 | 5.60 | 748% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers