Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs RDLAX
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$81.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.18M
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Hold and RDLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RDLAX (318M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GAFFX (0.57) vs RDLAX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GAFFX (9 years) vs RDLAX (19 years). RDLAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.29). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (32.00). RDLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: RDLAX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). RDLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.72 vs. GAFFX (6.09). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.22 vs. RDLAX (15.38).
| GAFFX | RDLAX | GAFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.06 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.15 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.292 | 11.317 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 318M | 106,604% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.09 | 7.72 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.22 | 73.16 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.22 | 15.38 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers