Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs RDLAX
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$87.43
Change-$1.96 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.60
Change-$0.28 (-2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.01M
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and RDLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. RDLAX (313M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GAFFX (0.56) vs RDLAX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GAFFX (9 years) vs RDLAX (19 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). RDLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: RDLAX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.29 vs. RDLAX (7.60). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.94 vs. RDLAX (16.14).
| GAFFX | RDLAX | GAFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.06 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.17 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.035 | 19.481 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 313M | 108,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.29 | 7.60 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.27 | 55.74 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.94 | 16.14 | 260% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement