Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs QCLGX
GAFFX vs QCLGX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs QCLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$78.34
Change-$0.95 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$25.39
Change-$0.39 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.92B
GAFFX vs QCLGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. QCLGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and QCLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. QCLGX (2.92B). GAFFX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: GAFFX (0.65) vs QCLGX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than QCLGX: GAFFX (8 years) vs QCLGX (20 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). QCLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: QCLGX (1500) vs GAFFX (1000000). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.87 vs. GAFFX (7.65). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.03 vs. QCLGX (33.07).
| GAFFX | QCLGX | GAFFX / QCLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.75 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.88 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.197 | 2.462 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 2.92B | 10,494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 9.87 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.61 | 55.67 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.03 | 33.07 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers