Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs QCLGX
GAFFX vs QCLGX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs QCLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$87.43
Change-$1.96 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.45
Change-$0.63 (-2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.11B
GAFFX vs QCLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. QCLGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and QCLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. QCLGX (4.12B). GAFFX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: GAFFX (0.56) vs QCLGX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than QCLGX: GAFFX (9 years) vs QCLGX (20 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). QCLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: QCLGX (1500) vs GAFFX (1000000). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. GAFFX (9.29). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.94 vs. QCLGX (26.82).
| GAFFX | QCLGX | GAFFX / QCLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.79 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.86 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.035 | 17.353 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 4.12B | 8,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.29 | 10.57 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.27 | 61.56 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.94 | 26.82 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement