Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs KLCSX
GAFFX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$78.34
Change-$0.95 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$19.40
Change-$0.26 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
GAFFX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. KLCSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and KLCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. KLCSX (1.23B). GAFFX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: GAFFX (0.65) vs KLCSX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GAFFX (8 years) vs KLCSX (11 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). GAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: KLCSX (0) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.65 vs. KLCSX (-14.73). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.03 vs. KLCSX (-34.99).
| GAFFX | KLCSX | GAFFX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.78 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.87 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.197 | 3.688 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 1.23B | 24,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | -14.73 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.61 | -19.67 | -278% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.03 | -34.99 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -3.43 | - |