Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs KLCCX
GAFFX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$84.60
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$11.65
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
GAFFX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. KLCCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and KLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. KLCCX (1.27B). GAFFX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: GAFFX (0.61) vs KLCCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GAFFX (9 years) vs KLCCX (18 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). GAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). KLCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: KLCCX (1500) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.06 vs. KLCCX (-22.98). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.37 vs. KLCCX (-58.74).
| GAFFX | KLCCX | GAFFX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.89 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.96 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.603 | 10.762 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 1.27B | 25,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.06 | -22.98 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.28 | -47.52 | -106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.37 | -58.74 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -37.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement