Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs KCGSX
GAFFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$82.92
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$22.37
Change+$0.23 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.79M
GAFFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. KCGSX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and KCGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. KCGSX (258M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: GAFFX (0.61) vs KCGSX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: GAFFX (8 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: KCGSX (0) vs GAFFX (1000000). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.07 vs. GAFFX (11.26). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.17 vs. GAFFX (51.33).
| GAFFX | KCGSX | GAFFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.86 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.86 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.347 | 7.703 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 258M | 125,194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.26 | 14.07 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.93 | 80.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.33 | 55.17 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers