Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs KCGSX
GAFFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$87.43
Change-$1.96 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$24.60
Change-$0.51 (-2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.26M
GAFFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. KCGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and KCGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. KCGSX (278M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: GAFFX (0.56) vs KCGSX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: GAFFX (9 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: KCGSX (0) vs GAFFX (1000000). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.40 vs. GAFFX (9.29). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 54.11 vs. GAFFX (41.94).
| GAFFX | KCGSX | GAFFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.86 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.86 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.035 | 20.896 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 278M | 122,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.29 | 19.40 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.27 | 100.57 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.94 | 54.11 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 159.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement