Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs KCGSX
GAFFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$88.06
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$24.48
Change+$0.14 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.56M
GAFFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. KCGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Hold and KCGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. KCGSX (279M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: GAFFX (0.58) vs KCGSX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: GAFFX (9 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: KCGSX (0) vs GAFFX (1000000). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.18 vs. GAFFX (11.99). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 49.70 vs. GAFFX (41.86).
| GAFFX | KCGSX | GAFFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.86 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.86 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.249 | 17.862 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 279M | 120,789% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 20.18 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.63 | 106.92 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.86 | 49.70 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 154.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement