Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs KCGSX
GAFFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$78.34
Change-$0.95 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$21.13
Change-$0.25 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.74M
GAFFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. KCGSX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and KCGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. KCGSX (248M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: GAFFX (0.65) vs KCGSX (0.01). GAFFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: GAFFX (8 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: KCGSX (0) vs GAFFX (1000000). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.01 vs. GAFFX (7.65). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.85 vs. GAFFX (51.03).
| GAFFX | KCGSX | GAFFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.86 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.86 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.197 | 1.733 | 300% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 248M | 123,387% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.01 | 5,990% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 10.01 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.61 | 74.05 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.03 | 55.85 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement