Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs GGRCX
GAFFX vs GGRCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs GGRCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$87.43
Change-$1.96 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$13.70
Change-$0.29 (-2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
GAFFX vs GGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. GGRCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and GGRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. GGRCX (172M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: GAFFX (0.56) vs GGRCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than GGRCX: GAFFX (9 years) vs GGRCX (26 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). GGRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: GGRCX (1000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.29 vs. GGRCX (-9.04). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.94 vs. GGRCX (-30.08).
| GAFFX | GGRCX | GAFFX / GGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.78 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.07 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.035 | -5.217 | -384% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 172M | 197,674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.29 | -9.04 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.27 | 35.43 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.94 | -30.08 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -54.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement