Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs GGRCX
GAFFX vs GGRCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs GGRCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$84.53
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$16.02
Change+$0.08 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.19M
GAFFX vs GGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. GGRCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and GGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. GGRCX (201M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: GAFFX (0.61) vs GGRCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than GGRCX: GAFFX (9 years) vs GGRCX (26 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). GGRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: GGRCX (1000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.64 vs. GAFFX (18.19). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.79 vs. GGRCX (-7.45).
| GAFFX | GGRCX | GAFFX / GGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.78 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.07 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.509 | 8.537 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 201M | 163,184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.19 | 19.64 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.69 | 54.34 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.79 | -7.45 | -681% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -50.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement