Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GABCX vs HMEAX
GABCX vs HMEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GABCX vs. HMEAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GABCX is a Hold and HMEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMEAX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. GABCX (419M). HMEAX pays higher dividends than GABCX: HMEAX (4.79) vs GABCX (2.78). GABCX was incepted earlier than HMEAX: GABCX (33 years) vs HMEAX (9 years). HMEAX (2.45) is less costly to investors than GABCX (0.87). HMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 406.00 vs. GABCX (155.00). GABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMEAX: GABCX (1000) vs HMEAX (2500). HMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.47 vs. GABCX (5.09). HMEAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.06 vs. GABCX (16.67).
| GABCX | HMEAX | GABCX / HMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 2.25 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 2.45 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.564 | 0.102 | 1,527% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 419M | 1.28B | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 4.79 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.09 | 5.47 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.93 | 16.26 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.67 | 21.06 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement