It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
G’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWNS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
G’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WNS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
G (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +13.41% price change this week, while WNS (@Information Technology Services) price change was +7.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.35%.
G is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
WNS is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
G | WNS | G / WNS | |
Capitalization | 8.1B | 2.37B | 342% |
EBITDA | N/A | 258M | - |
Gain YTD | 33.990 | -13.671 | -249% |
P/E Ratio | 12.61 | 21.65 | 58% |
Revenue | N/A | 1.31B | - |
Total Cash | 899M | 221M | 407% |
Total Debt | 1.87B | 447M | 419% |
G | WNS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
G's Valuation (14) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WNS (60). This means that G’s stock grew somewhat faster than WNS’s over the last 12 months.
G's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WNS (100). This means that G’s stock grew somewhat faster than WNS’s over the last 12 months.
G's SMR Rating (32) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as WNS (56). This means that G’s stock grew similarly to WNS’s over the last 12 months.
G's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as WNS (50). This means that G’s stock grew similarly to WNS’s over the last 12 months.
WNS's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for G (80). This means that WNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than G’s over the last 12 months.
G | WNS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago56% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 4 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago56% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, G has been loosely correlated with EXLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if G jumps, then EXLS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WNS has been loosely correlated with G. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WNS jumps, then G could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WNS | 100% | -0.24% | ||
G - WNS | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
SKTCF - WNS | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
EXLS - WNS | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
IBM - WNS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
CNXC - WNS | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More |