Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAOX vs NAESX
FZAOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FZAOX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Z
Price$35.64
Change-$0.90 (-2.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
FZAOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAOX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAOX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FZAOX (2.02B). FZAOX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FZAOX (1.52) vs NAESX (1.22). FZAOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FZAOX (12 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FZAOX (0.90) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FZAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FZAOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FZAOX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. FZAOX (-6.34). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. FZAOX (30.13).
| FZAOX | NAESX | FZAOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.488 | 6.726 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.22 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.34 | 1.42 | -446% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.44 | 33.14 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.13 | 48.22 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.36 | 137.58 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement