Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZANX vs RGACX
FZANX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FZANX vs RGACX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Z
Price$51.31
Change+$0.06 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
FZANX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZANX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZANX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FZANX (24.4B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FZANX: RGACX (0.07) vs FZANX (0.02). FZANX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FZANX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FZANX (0.53). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FZANX (18.00). FZANX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FZANX (0) vs RGACX (250). FZANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. RGACX (11.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. FZANX (34.18).
| FZANX | RGACX | FZANX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.94 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.94 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.013 | 17.655 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.4B | 337B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.07 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.22 | 11.01 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.35 | 70.57 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.18 | 37.85 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.05 | 96.78 | 91% |