Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAMX vs VIMSX
FZAMX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FZAMX vs VIMSX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$25.93
Change+$0.25 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.77
Change+$0.62 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.55B
FZAMX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAMX vs. VIMSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAMX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. FZAMX (1.6B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: VIMSX (1.37) vs FZAMX (0.50). FZAMX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FZAMX (12 years) vs VIMSX (28 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FZAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FZAMX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.45 vs. FZAMX (-5.27). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 44.85 vs. FZAMX (17.05).
| FZAMX | VIMSX | FZAMX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.458 | 9.959 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 199B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.37 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.27 | 2.45 | -215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.88 | 34.53 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.05 | 44.85 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.32 | 138.83 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement