Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAMX vs VIMSX
FZAMX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FZAMX vs VIMSX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$25.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$80.41
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.59B
FZAMX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAMX vs. VIMSX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAMX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 200B vs. FZAMX (1.6B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: VIMSX (1.37) vs FZAMX (0.50). FZAMX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FZAMX (12 years) vs VIMSX (28 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FZAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FZAMX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. FZAMX (2.19). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. FZAMX (9.93).
| FZAMX | VIMSX | FZAMX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.620 | 11.667 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 200B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.37 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.19 | 9.54 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.19 | 45.18 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.93 | 43.50 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.18 | 147.72 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement