Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAMX vs VIMSX
FZAMX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FZAMX vs VIMSX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$26.34
Change+$1.39 (+5.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$81.03
Change+$1.02 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.74B
FZAMX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAMX vs. VIMSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAMX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. FZAMX (1.67B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: VIMSX (1.37) vs FZAMX (0.31). FZAMX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FZAMX (12 years) vs VIMSX (28 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FZAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FZAMX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. FZAMX (4.64). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 38.77 vs. FZAMX (8.18).
| FZAMX | VIMSX | FZAMX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.483 | 2.272 | 285% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 199B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.37 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.64 | 8.23 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.19 | 33.97 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.18 | 38.77 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.66 | 180.15 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers