Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZALX vs VTSMX
FZALX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts FZALX vs VTSMX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Z
Price$29.00
Change-$0.07 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.55B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$154.00
Change-$0.41 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
FZALX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZALX vs. VTSMX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZALX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. FZALX (4.55B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than FZALX: VTSMX (1.09) vs FZALX (1.00). FZALX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: FZALX (12 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). FZALX (0.48) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). FZALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). FZALX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: FZALX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). FZALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.47 vs. VTSMX (16.21). FZALX return over 5 years is better than : 115.23 vs. VTSMX (85.82).
| FZALX | VTSMX | FZALX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.14 | 343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.14 | 343% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.429 | 9.266 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.09 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.47 | 16.21 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.07 | 46.80 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.23 | 85.82 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.45 | 202.54 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers