Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZALX vs RWMFX
FZALX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FZALX vs RWMFX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Z
Price$29.29
Change+$0.22 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.7B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.04B
FZALX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZALX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZALX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. FZALX (4.7B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FZALX: RWMFX (1.43) vs FZALX (1.00). FZALX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FZALX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). FZALX (0.48) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FZALX (9.00). FZALX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FZALX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FZALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.56 vs. RWMFX (7.95). FZALX return over 5 years is better than : 116.05 vs. RWMFX (50.81).
| FZALX | RWMFX | FZALX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.31 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.31 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.784 | 8.213 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 204B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.43 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.56 | 7.95 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.51 | 34.82 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.05 | 50.81 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.30 | 83.34 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers