Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs RGAGX
FZAFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$25.42
Change+$0.22 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
FZAFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. FZAFX (12.3B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: RGAGX (0.61) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FZAFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FZAFX (0.55) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FZAFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. FZAFX (0.95). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.72 vs. RGAGX (51.38).
| FZAFX | RGAGX | FZAFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.30 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.30 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.987 | 11.348 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 323B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.95 | 11.27 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.32 | 60.98 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.72 | 51.38 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.00 | 89.12 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement