Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs RGAGX
FZAFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$26.18
Change-$0.08 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.66B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FZAFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FZAFX (12.7B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: RGAGX (0.60) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FZAFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FZAFX (0.55) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FZAFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. FZAFX (6.34). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. RGAGX (46.14).
| FZAFX | RGAGX | FZAFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.30 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.30 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.185 | 14.500 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 329B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 15.11 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.50 | 43.78 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.81 | 46.14 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.13 | 90.14 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement