Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs RGAGX
FZAFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$26.21
Change+$0.24 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.59B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
FZAFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FZAFX (12.6B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: RGAGX (0.59) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FZAFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FZAFX (0.55) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FZAFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. FZAFX (7.77). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.92 vs. RGAGX (44.13).
| FZAFX | RGAGX | FZAFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.30 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.30 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.311 | 16.016 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 332B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.77 | 18.90 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.15 | 61.40 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.92 | 44.13 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.43 | 102.81 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement