Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs RGAFX
FZAFX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$24.10
Change-$0.33 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.63B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$78.28
Change-$0.94 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
FZAFX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. FZAFX (11.6B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: RGAFX (0.61) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FZAFX (12 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FZAFX (0.55) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FZAFX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. FZAFX (-0.70). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 59.08 vs. RGAFX (50.83).
| FZAFX | RGAFX | FZAFX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.34 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.34 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.431 | 5.187 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 306B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.70 | 7.61 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.88 | 54.50 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.08 | 50.83 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.67 | 75.29 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement