Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs RGAFX
FZAFX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$26.15
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$84.45
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
FZAFX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FZAFX (12.3B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: RGAFX (0.57) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FZAFX (12 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FZAFX (0.55) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FZAFX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.14 vs. FZAFX (9.41). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 58.39 vs. RGAFX (50.57).
| FZAFX | RGAFX | FZAFX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.34 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.34 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.059 | 13.478 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 328B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 18.14 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.78 | 59.54 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.39 | 50.57 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.30 | 89.02 | 161% |