Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs RGACX
FZAFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGACX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$25.42
Change+$0.22 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$79.90
Change+$0.78 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
FZAFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. FZAFX (12.3B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: RGACX (0.07) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FZAFX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FZAFX (0.55). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FZAFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. FZAFX (0.95). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.72 vs. RGACX (47.06).
| FZAFX | RGACX | FZAFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.94 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.94 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.987 | 10.988 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 323B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.95 | 10.28 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.32 | 58.08 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.72 | 47.06 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.00 | 82.67 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers