Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs RGACX
FZAFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGACX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$24.10
Change-$0.33 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.63B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.52
Change-$0.91 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
FZAFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. FZAFX (11.6B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: RGACX (0.08) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FZAFX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FZAFX (0.55). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FZAFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. FZAFX (-0.70). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 59.08 vs. RGACX (46.78).
| FZAFX | RGACX | FZAFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.94 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.94 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.431 | 4.903 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 306B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.70 | 6.70 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.88 | 51.90 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.08 | 46.78 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.67 | 69.68 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers