Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
Price$41.47
Change-$0.42 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.91B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FZACX (3.91B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FZACX (0.46) vs RGEBX (0.00). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZACX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FZACX (0.44). FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZACX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FZACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. RGEBX (1.80). FZACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.97 vs. RGEBX (9.88).
| FZACX | RGEBX | FZACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.08 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.08 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.715 | -1.057 | -352% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 336B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.24 | 1.80 | 458% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.34 | 41.63 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.97 | 9.88 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.40 | 110.02 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers