Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
Price$42.74
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.89B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$85.45
Change+$0.51 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FZACX (3.89B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FZACX (0.45) vs RGEBX (0.00). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZACX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FZACX (0.44). FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZACX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. FZACX (-1.78). FZACX (29.38) and RGEBX (28.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FZACX | RGEBX | FZACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.659 | 18.393 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.89B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | 6.24 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.92 | 59.18 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.38 | 28.63 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.73 | 85.53 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement