Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
Price$40.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.89B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FZACX (3.89B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FZACX (0.45) vs RGEBX (0.00). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZACX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FZACX (0.44). FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZACX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FZACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. RGEBX (5.18). FZACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.32 vs. RGEBX (19.19).
| FZACX | RGEBX | FZACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.08 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.08 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.768 | 8.539 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.89B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 5.18 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.85 | 62.27 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.32 | 19.19 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.66 | 88.81 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement