Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGAHX
FZACX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGAHX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
Price$42.74
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.89B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.38
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FZACX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FZACX (3.89B). FZACX (0.45) and RGAHX (0.44) have matching dividends . FZACX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FZACX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FZACX (0.44) and RGAHX (0.44) have similar cost to investors . FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FZACX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.14 vs. FZACX (-1.78). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.51 vs. FZACX (29.38).
| FZACX | RGAHX | FZACX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.659 | 19.104 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.89B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.44 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | 7.14 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.92 | 62.15 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.38 | 32.51 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.73 | 93.22 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement