Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERGX
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERGX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$29.41
Change-$0.38 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$59.10
Change-$0.80 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FZABX (1.52B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERGX: FZABX (1.69) vs RERGX (1.37). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FZABX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RERGX (30.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FZABX (0) vs RERGX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. RERGX (3.95). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 31.54 vs. RERGX (20.61).
| FZABX | RERGX | FZABX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.199 | 10.015 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.37 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | 3.95 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.07 | 26.91 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.54 | 20.61 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.92 | 23.65 | 194% |