Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERGX
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERGX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.63
Change+$0.27 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$64.05
Change+$0.20 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.4B
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERGX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.55B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERGX: FZABX (1.64) vs RERGX (0.93). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FZABX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FZABX (0) vs RERGX (250). RERGX (6.08) and FZABX (6.02) have marching annual gain over last year. FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.61 vs. RERGX (18.15).
| FZABX | RERGX | FZABX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.019 | 19.229 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.93 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.02 | 6.08 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.48 | 52.25 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.61 | 18.15 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.44 | 52.62 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement