Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERGX
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERGX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.07
Change+$0.09 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$60.85
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.48B
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a StrongBuy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FZABX (1.58B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERGX: FZABX (1.63) vs RERGX (0.95). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FZABX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RERGX (30.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FZABX (0) vs RERGX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. RERGX (5.66). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 28.98 vs. RERGX (18.58).
| FZABX | RERGX | FZABX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.807 | 13.273 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.95 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 5.66 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.69 | 30.86 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.98 | 18.58 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.75 | 29.35 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement