Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERCX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$59.57
Change-$0.31 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Hold and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.58B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERCX: FZABX (1.63) vs RERCX (0.50). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FZABX (0) vs RERCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. RERCX (9.30). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 25.28 vs. RERCX (13.11).
| FZABX | RERCX | FZABX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.795 | 14.206 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.50 | 327% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.89 | 9.30 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.73 | 28.83 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.28 | 13.11 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.83 | 26.24 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement