Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERCX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.03
Change-$1.23 (-3.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$61.74
Change-$1.68 (-2.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.74B). RERCX pays higher dividends than FZABX: RERCX (2.48) vs FZABX (1.63). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.72). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RERCX (35.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FZABX (0) vs RERCX (250). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.63 vs. FZABX (16.25). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 7.42 vs. RERCX (-5.91).
| FZABX | RERCX | FZABX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.12 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.12 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.215 | 5.629 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 2.48 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.25 | 17.63 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.14 | 23.91 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.42 | -5.91 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.53 | 62.87 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement