Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERCX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$31.59
Change-$0.42 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$63.79
Change-$1.10 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FZABX (1.63B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERCX: FZABX (1.56) vs RERCX (0.46). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RERCX (35.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FZABX (0) vs RERCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.83 vs. RERCX (15.59). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 21.18 vs. RERCX (7.02).
| FZABX | RERCX | FZABX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.472 | 22.297 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 139B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.46 | 340% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.83 | 15.59 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.39 | 34.71 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.18 | 7.02 | 302% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.88 | 42.67 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement