Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.63
Change+$0.27 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$59.52
Change+$0.18 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.4B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.55B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.64) vs RERAX (0.23). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). RERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. RERAX (4.50). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.61 vs. RERAX (11.94).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.019 | 18.025 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.23 | 717% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.02 | 4.50 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.48 | 47.53 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.61 | 11.94 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.44 | 42.81 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement