Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.07
Change+$0.09 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$56.70
Change+$0.12 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.48B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a StrongBuy and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FZABX (1.58B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.63) vs RERAX (0.23). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RERAX (30.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. RERAX (4.08). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 28.98 vs. RERAX (12.35).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.807 | 12.433 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.23 | 699% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 4.08 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.69 | 26.81 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.98 | 12.35 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.75 | 21.06 | 241% |