Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$31.59
Change-$0.42 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$61.37
Change-$1.05 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FZABX (1.63B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.56) vs RERAX (0.22). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RERAX (35.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.26 vs. RERAX (15.94). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 20.53 vs. RERAX (6.15).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.800 | 23.776 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 139B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.22 | 725% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.26 | 15.94 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.33 | 33.97 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.53 | 6.15 | 334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.49 | 41.43 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement