Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FYC vs XSMO
FYC vs XSMO Comparison
Open Charts FYC vs XSMO
First Trust Small Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$90.50
Change-$3.03 (-3.24%)
Volume$108.8K
Net Assets653.3M
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
Price$70.89
Change-$1.76 (-2.42%)
Volume$272.82K
Net Assets2B
FYC vs XSMO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FYC vs. XSMO commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYC is a Hold and XSMO is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XSMO has more net assets: 2B vs. FYC (653M). FYC has a higher annual dividend yield than XSMO: FYC (20.897) vs XSMO (10.618). FYC was incepted earlier than XSMO: FYC (15 years) vs XSMO (21 years). XSMO (0.36) has a lower expense ratio than FYC (0.71). FYC has a higher turnover XSMO (115.00) vs XSMO (115.00).
| FYC | XSMO | FYC / XSMO | |
| Gain YTD | 20.897 | 10.618 | 197% |
| Net Assets | 653M | 2B | 33% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.36 | 197% |
| Turnover | 141.00 | 115.00 | 123% |
| Yield | 0.24 | 0.84 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FYC | XSMO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 28 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYC has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYC jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYC | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| ENVA - FYC | 77% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| TPG - FYC | 76% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| STEP - FYC | 76% Closely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| APAM - FYC | 74% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| CSW - FYC | 74% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
More | ||||
XSMO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XSMO has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XSMO jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XSMO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XSMO | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| PIPR - XSMO | 84% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| MC - XSMO | 83% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| ABCB - XSMO | 82% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| UFPI - XSMO | 81% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| FULT - XSMO | 80% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||