FYBR
Price
$34.85
Change
+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Updated
Dec 18, 12:43 PM (EDT)
65 days until earnings call
VZ
Price
$40.79
Change
-$0.09 (-0.22%)
Updated
Dec 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
37 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FYBR vs VZ

Header iconFYBR vs VZ Comparison
Open Charts FYBR vs VZBanner chart's image
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$34.85
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Verizon Communications
Price$40.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.22%)
Volume$90.94K
CapitalizationN/A
FYBR vs VZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FYBR vs. VZ commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYBR is a Buy and VZ is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FYBR: $34.83 vs. VZ: $40.78)
Brand notoriety: FYBR: Not notable vs. VZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FYBR: 108% vs. VZ: 88%
Market capitalization -- FYBR: $6.02B vs. VZ: $176.65B
FYBR [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $6.02B. VZ’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $176.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FYBR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VZ is a better buy in the long-term than FYBR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FYBR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FYBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FYBR is a better buy in the short-term than VZ.

Price Growth

FYBR (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +0.58% price change this week, while VZ (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -3.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FYBR is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

VZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+0.12% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VZ($177B) has a higher market cap than FYBR($6.02B). FYBR has higher P/E ratio than VZ: FYBR (199.42) vs VZ (15.37). FYBR YTD gains are higher at: 37.451 vs. VZ (15.376). VZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.1B vs. FYBR (2.19B). FYBR has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. VZ (2.07B). FYBR has less debt than VZ: FYBR (11.3B) vs VZ (175B). VZ has higher revenues than FYBR: VZ (134B) vs FYBR (5.68B).
FYBRVZFYBR / VZ
Capitalization6.02B177B3%
EBITDA2.19B40.1B5%
Gain YTD37.45115.376244%
P/E Ratio199.4215.371,297%
Revenue5.68B134B4%
Total Cash2.2B2.07B107%
Total Debt11.3B175B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VZ: Fundamental Ratings
VZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
70
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FYBRVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with T. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then T could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
+0.20%
T - FYBR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
VZ - FYBR
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
CCOI - FYBR
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
LBTYA - FYBR
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
LBTYK - FYBR
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
More

VZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VZ has been closely correlated with T. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VZ jumps, then T could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VZ
1D Price
Change %
VZ100%
-0.24%
T - VZ
70%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
FYBR - VZ
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
TU - VZ
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
BCE - VZ
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
TMUS - VZ
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.82%
More