FYBR
Price
$34.85
Change
+$0.10 (+0.29%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:09 PM (EDT)
98 days until earnings call
TEO
Price
$13.13
Change
+$0.13 (+1.00%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:47 PM (EDT)
111 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FYBR vs TEO

Header iconFYBR vs TEO Comparison
Open Charts FYBR vs TEOBanner chart's image
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$34.85
Change+$0.10 (+0.29%)
Volume$1.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Telecom Argentina SA
Price$13.13
Change+$0.13 (+1.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
FYBR vs TEO Comparison Chart
Loading...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TEO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FYBR vs. TEO commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYBR is a StrongSell and TEO is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FYBR: $34.75 vs. TEO: $13.00)
Brand notoriety: FYBR and TEO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FYBR: 167% vs. TEO: 270%
Market capitalization -- FYBR: $6.02B vs. TEO: $2.86B
FYBR [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $6.02B. TEO’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FYBR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TEO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TEO is a better buy in the long-term than FYBR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FYBR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FYBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TEO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FYBR is a better buy in the short-term than TEO.

Price Growth

FYBR (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -0.23% price change this week, while TEO (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +10.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +9.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

FYBR is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

TEO is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+9.27% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYBR($6.02B) has a higher market cap than TEO($2.86B). FYBR has higher P/E ratio than TEO: FYBR (199.42) vs TEO (10.97). TEO YTD gains are higher at: 81.818 vs. FYBR (37.135). TEO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 175B vs. FYBR (2.19B). TEO has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. FYBR (2.2B). FYBR has less debt than TEO: FYBR (11.3B) vs TEO (2.22T). TEO has higher revenues than FYBR: TEO (2.06T) vs FYBR (5.68B).
FYBRTEOFYBR / TEO
Capitalization6.02B2.86B211%
EBITDA2.19B175B1%
Gain YTD37.13581.81845%
P/E Ratio199.4210.971,818%
Revenue5.68B2.06T0%
Total Cash2.2B284B1%
Total Debt11.3B2.22T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TEO: Fundamental Ratings
TEO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FYBRTEO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TEO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with T. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then T could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
+0.23%
T - FYBR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
VZ - FYBR
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
ATUS - FYBR
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
CCOI - FYBR
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
LBTYA - FYBR
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.62%
More

TEO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TEO and TV have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TEO and TV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEO
1D Price
Change %
TEO100%
+12.07%
TV - TEO
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
FYBR - TEO
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
TELDF - TEO
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKC - TEO
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
RCI - TEO
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More