FYBR
Price
$35.73
Change
-$0.20 (-0.56%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.02B
28 days until earnings call
T
Price
$26.65
Change
-$1.95 (-6.82%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
125.89B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FYBR vs T

Header iconFYBR vs T Comparison
Open Charts FYBR vs TBanner chart's image
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$35.73
Change-$0.20 (-0.56%)
Volume$17.9K
Capitalization6.02B
AT&T
Price$26.65
Change-$1.95 (-6.82%)
Volume$257.09K
Capitalization125.89B
FYBR vs T Comparison Chart
Loading...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FYBR vs. T commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYBR is a Hold and T is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FYBR: $35.94 vs. T: $28.60)
Brand notoriety: FYBR: Not notable vs. T: Notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FYBR: 77% vs. T: 112%
Market capitalization -- FYBR: $6.02B vs. T: $125.89B
FYBR [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $6.02B. T’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $125.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FYBR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • T’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, T is a better buy in the long-term than FYBR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FYBR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while T’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FYBR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • T’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, T is a better buy in the short-term than FYBR.

Price Growth

FYBR (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while T (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +1.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

FYBR is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

T is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (-3.05% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
T($126B) has a higher market cap than FYBR($6.02B). FYBR has higher P/E ratio than T: FYBR (199.42) vs T (8.88). T YTD gains are higher at: 27.195 vs. FYBR (3.573). T has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 45.3B vs. FYBR (2.19B). T has more cash in the bank: 6.72B vs. FYBR (2.2B). FYBR has less debt than T: FYBR (11.3B) vs T (155B). T has higher revenues than FYBR: T (122B) vs FYBR (5.68B).
FYBRTFYBR / T
Capitalization6.02B126B5%
EBITDA2.19B45.3B5%
Gain YTD3.57327.19513%
P/E Ratio199.428.882,245%
Revenue5.68B122B5%
Total Cash2.2B6.72B33%
Total Debt11.3B155B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
T: Fundamental Ratings
T
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FYBRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with T. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then T could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
-0.31%
T - FYBR
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
VZ - FYBR
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
CCOI - FYBR
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
LBTYA - FYBR
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.26%
LBTYK - FYBR
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.77%
More

T and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, T has been closely correlated with VZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if T jumps, then VZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To T
1D Price
Change %
T100%
+1.63%
VZ - T
71%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
FYBR - T
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
TMUS - T
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
CMCSA - T
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
VOD - T
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
More