FYBR
Price
$37.84
Change
-$0.12 (-0.32%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.48B
98 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
S
Price
$16.51
Change
-$0.63 (-3.68%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.53B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FYBR vs S

Header iconFYBR vs S Comparison
Open Charts FYBR vs SBanner chart's image
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$37.84
Change-$0.12 (-0.32%)
Volume$2.95M
Capitalization9.48B
SentinelOne
Price$16.51
Change-$0.63 (-3.68%)
Volume$7.77M
Capitalization5.53B
FYBR vs S Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FYBR vs. S commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYBR is a StrongBuy and S is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FYBR: $37.96 vs. S: $17.14)
Brand notoriety: FYBR: Not notable vs. S: Notable
FYBR represents the Major Telecommunications, while S is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FYBR: 93% vs. S: 70%
Market capitalization -- FYBR: $9.48B vs. S: $5.53B
FYBR [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $9.48B. S’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $5.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $240B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.74T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.48B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FYBR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FYBR and S are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FYBR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FYBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • S’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FYBR is a better buy in the short-term than S.

Price Growth

FYBR (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while S (@Computer Communications) price change was +2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.33%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

FYBR is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2026.

S is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.34% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

@Computer Communications (-1.70% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYBR($9.48B) has a higher market cap than S($5.53B). FYBR YTD gains are higher at: 9.395 vs. S (-22.793). FYBR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.11B vs. S (-235.73M). S has more cash in the bank: 811M vs. FYBR (412M). S has less debt than FYBR: S (11.5M) vs FYBR (11.9B). FYBR has higher revenues than S: FYBR (5.98B) vs S (907M).
FYBRSFYBR / S
Capitalization9.48B5.53B171%
EBITDA2.11B-235.73M-896%
Gain YTD9.395-22.793-41%
P/E Ratio253.14N/A-
Revenue5.98B907M659%
Total Cash412M811M51%
Total Debt11.9B11.5M103,478%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
S: Fundamental Ratings
S
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FYBRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FYBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
S
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBP97.181.87
+1.97%
Invesco DB Precious Metals
TOUS34.550.27
+0.79%
T. Rowe Price International Equity ETF
DXIV63.000.33
+0.52%
Dimensional International Vector Eq ETF
WAR25.31-0.01
-0.02%
U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace and Defense ETF
HQGO60.32-0.10
-0.16%
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
+0.24%
S - FYBR
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
WOW - FYBR
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
VOD - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
ASTS - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.01%
AD - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
More

S and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To S
1D Price
Change %
S100%
-0.81%
HUBS - S
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
COIN - S
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.00%
CLSK - S
63%
Loosely correlated
-5.09%
CRM - S
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
ZS - S
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.29%
More