FYBR
Price
$37.53
Change
+$0.02 (+0.05%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.39B
9 days until earnings call
LMGHF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.30 (+16.67%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
797.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FYBR vs LMGHF

Header iconFYBR vs LMGHF Comparison
Open Charts FYBR vs LMGHFBanner chart's image
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$37.53
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
Volume$973.07K
Capitalization9.39B
VICTORY PARTN VIII NORWAY HLDG AS
Price$2.10
Change+$0.30 (+16.67%)
Volume$11.5K
Capitalization797.86M
FYBR vs LMGHF Comparison Chart in %
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FYBR vs. LMGHF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYBR is a Hold and LMGHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FYBR: $37.53 vs. LMGHF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: FYBR and LMGHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FYBR: 35% vs. LMGHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FYBR: $9.39B vs. LMGHF: $797.86M
FYBR [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $9.39B. LMGHF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $797.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $258.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FYBR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLMGHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LMGHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FYBR is a better buy in the long-term than LMGHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FYBR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FYBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FYBR (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +0.56% price change this week, while LMGHF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

FYBR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.34% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYBR($9.39B) has a higher market cap than LMGHF($798M). FYBR has higher P/E ratio than LMGHF: FYBR (253.14) vs LMGHF (18.75). FYBR YTD gains are higher at: 8.156 vs. LMGHF (0.000). FYBR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.11B vs. LMGHF (687M). LMGHF has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. FYBR (412M). LMGHF has less debt than FYBR: LMGHF (2.67B) vs FYBR (11.9B). LMGHF has higher revenues than FYBR: LMGHF (6.92B) vs FYBR (5.98B).
FYBRLMGHFFYBR / LMGHF
Capitalization9.39B798M1,177%
EBITDA2.11B687M308%
Gain YTD8.1560.000-
P/E Ratio253.1418.751,350%
Revenue5.98B6.92B86%
Total Cash412M1.79B23%
Total Debt11.9B2.67B445%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FYBRLMGHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IARCX16.870.11
+0.66%
Invesco Real Estate C
BWLRX26.270.15
+0.57%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R6
FLCCX48.690.18
+0.37%
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap C
PASSX58.250.09
+0.15%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Adv
SUTCX16.680.02
+0.12%
AB Sustainable US Thematic C

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
+0.05%
S - FYBR
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
ASTS - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
-6.72%
AD - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
CLCMF - FYBR
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHEN - FYBR
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More

LMGHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMGHF and KDDIF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMGHF and KDDIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMGHF
1D Price
Change %
LMGHF100%
N/A
KDDIF - LMGHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FYBR - LMGHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
MYTEF - LMGHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - LMGHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKBNF - LMGHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More