FYBR
Price
$36.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
27 days until earnings call
HTWSF
Price
$1.63
Change
-$0.07 (-4.12%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FYBR vs HTWSF

Header iconFYBR vs HTWSF Comparison
Open Charts FYBR vs HTWSFBanner chart's image
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$36.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$768.36K
Capitalization6.02B
Helios Towers
Price$1.63
Change-$0.07 (-4.12%)
Volume$400
Capitalization1.22B
FYBR vs HTWSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FYBR vs. HTWSF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYBR is a Buy and HTWSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FYBR: $36.50 vs. HTWSF: $1.63)
Brand notoriety: FYBR and HTWSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FYBR: 25% vs. HTWSF: 10%
Market capitalization -- FYBR: $6.02B vs. HTWSF: $1.22B
FYBR [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $6.02B. HTWSF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FYBR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHTWSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HTWSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HTWSF is a better buy in the long-term than FYBR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FYBR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTWSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FYBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HTWSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FYBR and HTWSF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FYBR (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while HTWSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

FYBR is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.70% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYBR($6.02B) has a higher market cap than HTWSF($1.22B). HTWSF YTD gains are higher at: 52.336 vs. FYBR (5.187). FYBR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.19B vs. HTWSF (113M). FYBR has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. HTWSF (389M). HTWSF has less debt than FYBR: HTWSF (1.47B) vs FYBR (11.3B). FYBR has higher revenues than HTWSF: FYBR (5.68B) vs HTWSF (502M).
FYBRHTWSFFYBR / HTWSF
Capitalization6.02B1.22B493%
EBITDA2.19B113M1,934%
Gain YTD5.18752.33610%
P/E Ratio199.42N/A-
Revenue5.68B502M1,131%
Total Cash2.2B389M566%
Total Debt11.3B1.47B768%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FYBRHTWSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UOPIX126.322.45
+1.98%
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Inv
ECLCX30.360.34
+1.13%
Eaton Vance Growth C
RICCX63.240.60
+0.96%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R3
RYZCX123.350.75
+0.61%
Rydex Precious Metals C
FIVFX32.700.18
+0.55%
Fidelity International Capital Apprec

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with T. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then T could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
N/A
T - FYBR
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
VZ - FYBR
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
CCOI - FYBR
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
LBTYA - FYBR
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
LBTYK - FYBR
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

HTWSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and CLCMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and CLCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTWSF
1D Price
Change %
HTWSF100%
N/A
CLCMF - HTWSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFTBY - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
MTNOY - HTWSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
LLEIF - HTWSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FYBR - HTWSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More