FXU | UTES | FXU / UTES | |
Gain YTD | 12.038 | 15.688 | 77% |
Net Assets | 1.65B | 510M | 324% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.49 | 129% |
Turnover | 53.00 | 51.00 | 104% |
Yield | 2.22 | 1.32 | 168% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
FXU | UTES | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago87% | 5 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago81% | 7 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FXU has been closely correlated with LNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FXU jumps, then LNT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTES has been closely correlated with VST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UTES jumps, then VST could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UTES | 100% | -0.58% | ||
VST - UTES | 89% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
CEG - UTES | 81% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
TLN - UTES | 80% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
NRG - UTES | 76% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
NEE - UTES | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
More |