FXLG
Price
$35.45
Change
-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
GBOOF
Price
$9.50
Change
-$0.06 (-0.63%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FXLG vs GBOOF

Header iconFXLG vs GBOOF Comparison
Open Charts FXLG vs GBOOFBanner chart's image
F.S. Ban
Price$35.45
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. De C.V
Price$9.50
Change-$0.06 (-0.63%)
Volume$1.82K
Capitalization27.44B
FXLG vs GBOOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FXLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FXLG vs. GBOOF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXLG is a Buy and GBOOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FXLG: $35.45 vs. GBOOF: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: FXLG and GBOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FXLG: 41% vs. GBOOF: 17%
Market capitalization -- FXLG: $0 vs. GBOOF: $27.44B
FXLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. GBOOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $27.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FXLG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGBOOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FXLG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GBOOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBOOF is a better buy in the long-term than FXLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FXLG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBOOF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FXLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GBOOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GBOOF is a better buy in the short-term than FXLG.

Price Growth

FXLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.52% price change this week, while GBOOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBOOF YTD gains are higher at: 41.264 vs. FXLG (12.985).
FXLGGBOOFFXLG / GBOOF
CapitalizationN/A27.4B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.98541.26431%
P/E RatioN/A9.45-
RevenueN/A186B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A130B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FXLG vs GBOOF: Fundamental Ratings
FXLG
GBOOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2832
SMR RATING
1..100
411
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6943
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FXLG's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as GBOOF (95). This means that FXLG’s stock grew similarly to GBOOF’s over the last 12 months.

FXLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as GBOOF (32). This means that FXLG’s stock grew similarly to GBOOF’s over the last 12 months.

GBOOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FXLG (41). This means that GBOOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FXLG’s over the last 12 months.

GBOOF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FXLG (50). This means that GBOOF’s stock grew similarly to FXLG’s over the last 12 months.

GBOOF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FXLG (69). This means that GBOOF’s stock grew similarly to FXLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FXLGGBOOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FXLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPWR3.150.61
+24.02%
NET Power
BBD3.100.06
+2.09%
Banco Bradesco SA
STHO7.870.01
+0.13%
Star Holdings
QTTB1.44N/A
N/A
Q32 Bio
CXT56.51-0.17
-0.30%
Crane NXT Co

FXLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FXLG and MBBC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FXLG and MBBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FXLG
1D Price
Change %
FXLG100%
-0.14%
MBBC - FXLG
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKSB - FXLG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBNY - FXLG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBOOY - FXLG
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
GBOOF - FXLG
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More

GBOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBOOF and RAIFY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBOOF and RAIFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBOOF
1D Price
Change %
GBOOF100%
-0.60%
RAIFY - GBOOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
BPXXY - GBOOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSY - GBOOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
FOTB - GBOOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FXLG - GBOOF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More