Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCHS
FXI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCHS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$39.20
Change-$0.29 (-0.73%)
Volume$345.32K
Net Assets6.63B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$33.12
Change-$0.15 (-0.45%)
Volume$200
Net Assets2.67M
FXI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCHS commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.63B vs. MCHS (2.67M). FXI (31.527) and MCHS (30.621) have matching annual dividend yield . FXI was incepted earlier than MCHS: FXI (21 years) vs MCHS (2 years). FXI (0.74) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover FXI (18.00) vs FXI (18.00).
| FXI | MCHS | FXI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 31.527 | 30.621 | 103% |
| Net Assets | 6.63B | 2.67M | 248,520% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 115.31 | 16% |
| Yield | 2.43 | 4.27 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +2.51% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.64% |