Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCHS
FXI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCHS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$40.65
Change-$0.26 (-0.64%)
Volume$216.65K
Net Assets6.87B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$34.18
Change+$0.30 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71M
FXI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCHS commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a Buy and MCHS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.87B vs. MCHS (2.71M). FXI has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: FXI (36.291) vs MCHS (32.564). FXI was incepted earlier than MCHS: FXI (21 years) vs MCHS (2 years). FXI (0.74) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover FXI (18.00) vs FXI (18.00).
| FXI | MCHS | FXI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 36.291 | 32.564 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 6.87B | 2.71M | 253,319% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 115.31 | 16% |
| Yield | 2.42 | 4.17 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 88% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.24% |