Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCHS
FXI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCHS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$38.19
Change-$0.53 (-1.37%)
Volume$20.85K
Net Assets6.45B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$36.33
Change-$0.31 (-0.85%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.93M
FXI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCHS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.45B vs. MCHS (2.93M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than FXI: MCHS (9.392) vs FXI (1.123). FXI was incepted earlier than MCHS: FXI (21 years) vs MCHS (2 years). FXI (0.73) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover FXI (26.00) vs FXI (26.00).
| FXI | MCHS | FXI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.123 | 9.392 | 12% |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 2.93M | 220,184% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.89 | 82% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 115.31 | 23% |
| Yield | 2.33 | 3.21 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 14 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SCHY | 32.06 | 0.37 | +1.17% |
| Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | |||
| EIRL | 76.24 | 0.52 | +0.69% |
| iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | |||
| HEQT | 32.36 | -0.18 | -0.55% |
| Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | |||
| TMED | 29.51 | -0.31 | -1.03% |
| T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF | |||
| SZK | 10.50 | -0.38 | -3.53% |
| ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.02% |