Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCHS
FXI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCHS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$37.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$941.89K
Net Assets6.22B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$28.61
Change-$0.08 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.3M
FXI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCHS commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a StrongBuy and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.22B vs. MCHS (2.3M). FXI has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: FXI (23.798) vs MCHS (12.640). FXI was incepted earlier than MCHS: FXI (21 years) vs MCHS (1 year). FXI (0.74) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover FXI (18.00) vs FXI (18.00).
| FXI | MCHS | FXI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 23.798 | 12.640 | 188% |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 2.3M | 270,374% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 115.31 | 16% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 5.06 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A |