Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCHS
FXI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCHS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$38.21
Change+$0.15 (+0.39%)
Volume$25.26M
Net Assets6.43B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$31.23
Change+$1.89 (+6.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5M
FXI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCHS commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a StrongBuy and MCHS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.43B vs. MCHS (2.5M). FXI has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: FXI (27.296) vs MCHS (15.191). FXI was incepted earlier than MCHS: FXI (21 years) vs MCHS (2 years). FXI (0.74) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover FXI (18.00) vs FXI (18.00).
| FXI | MCHS | FXI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 27.296 | 15.191 | 180% |
| Net Assets | 6.43B | 2.5M | 257,320% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 115.31 | 16% |
| Yield | 2.62 | 4.86 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 6 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 89% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.43% |