Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCHS
FXI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCHS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$38.93
Change+$0.38 (+0.99%)
Volume$19.52M
Net Assets6.49B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$33.02
Change+$0.26 (+0.79%)
Volume$269
Net Assets2.63M
FXI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCHS commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a StrongBuy and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.49B vs. MCHS (2.63M). MCHS (29.627) and FXI (28.429) have matching annual dividend yield . FXI was incepted earlier than MCHS: FXI (21 years) vs MCHS (2 years). FXI (0.73) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover FXI (26.00) vs FXI (26.00).
| FXI | MCHS | FXI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 28.429 | 29.627 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 6.49B | 2.63M | 246,918% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.89 | 82% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 115.31 | 23% |
| Yield | 2.43 | 4.27 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +2.00% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.14% |