Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCH
FXI vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCH
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$40.33
Change-$0.34 (-0.84%)
Volume$21.84M
Net Assets6.9B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$29.51
Change-$0.20 (-0.67%)
Volume$1.26K
Net Assets23.64M
FXI vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCH commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a Hold and MCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.91B vs. MCH (23.6M). FXI (34.359) and MCH (33.844) have matching annual dividend yield . FXI was incepted earlier than MCH: FXI (21 years) vs MCH (3 years). FXI (0.74) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover FXI (18.00) vs FXI (18.00).
| FXI | MCH | FXI / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 34.359 | 33.844 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 6.91B | 23.6M | 29,258% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.79 | 94% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 55.22 | 33% |
| Yield | 2.47 | 1.03 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCH and DIDIY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCH and DIDIY's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| TCOM - MCH | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| YUMC - MCH | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||