Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs TRSCX
FXAIX vs TRSCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs TRSCX
Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Eq Ret
Price$31.13
Change+$0.12 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.46B
FXAIX vs TRSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. TRSCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a StrongBuy and TRSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 739B vs. TRSCX (6.46B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than TRSCX: FXAIX (1.11) vs TRSCX (0.84). FXAIX was incepted earlier than TRSCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs TRSCX (23 years). TRSCX (0.42) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). TRSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX (0) and TRSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.65 vs. TRSCX (-4.41). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 99.16 vs. TRSCX (30.41).
| FXAIX | TRSCX | FXAIX / TRSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.42 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.42 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.801 | 15.596 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 739B | 6.46B | 11,434% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.84 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.65 | -4.41 | -332% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.57 | 26.79 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.16 | 30.41 | 326% |
| Returns for 10 years | 260.14 | 93.59 | 278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement