Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBCX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$62.31
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.61B
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and NSBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 739B vs. NSBCX (6.61B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FXAIX (1.11) vs NSBCX (0.13). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. NSBCX (-0.26). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.07 vs. NSBCX (37.24).
| FXAIX | NSBCX | FXAIX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.557 | 1.616 | 1,148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 739B | 6.61B | 11,173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.13 | 881% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | -0.26 | -6,032% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.97 | 24.23 | 359% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.07 | 37.24 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 270.59 | 94.58 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement