Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBCX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$62.80
Change-$4.10 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.69B
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NSBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 753B vs. NSBCX (6.69B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FXAIX (1.10) vs NSBCX (0.15). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. NSBCX (0.47). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 93.74 vs. NSBCX (35.22).
| FXAIX | NSBCX | FXAIX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.998 | 1.635 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 753B | 6.69B | 11,251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.15 | 721% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 0.47 | 3,794% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.94 | 24.08 | 315% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.74 | 35.22 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 310.97 | 110.93 | 280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement