Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and MNVRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. MNVRX (366M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVRX: FXAIX (1.12) vs MNVRX (0.76). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVRX: FXAIX (14 years) vs MNVRX (12 years). MNVRX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVRX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVRX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.54 vs. MNVRX (-7.53). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 105.92 vs. MNVRX (16.56).
| FXAIX | MNVRX | FXAIX / MNVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.435 | -1.436 | -1,005% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 723B | 366M | 197,541% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.76 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.54 | -7.53 | -206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.16 | 27.19 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.92 | 16.56 | 640% |
| Returns for 10 years | 261.52 | 45.79 | 571% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement