Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MNVAX
FXAIX vs MNVAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVAX
FXAIX vs MNVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and MNVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 739B vs. MNVAX (345M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVAX: FXAIX (1.11) vs MNVAX (0.32). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVAX: FXAIX (15 years) vs MNVAX (12 years). MNVAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVAX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVAX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.89 vs. MNVAX (-2.98). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.72 vs. MNVAX (14.25).
| FXAIX | MNVAX | FXAIX / MNVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.16 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.16 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.942 | 4.271 | 443% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 739B | 345M | 214,203% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.32 | 348% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.89 | -2.98 | -533% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.33 | 34.13 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.72 | 14.25 | 707% |
| Returns for 10 years | 268.58 | 66.72 | 403% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement