Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMRX
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMRX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
Price$25.47
Change+$0.09 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.8B
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMRX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 753B vs. LAMRX (4.8B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FXAIX (1.10) vs LAMRX (0.41). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FXAIX (15 years) vs LAMRX (18 years). LAMRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. LAMRX (11.33). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 93.74 vs. LAMRX (45.13).
| FXAIX | LAMRX | FXAIX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.998 | 2.421 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 753B | 4.8B | 15,684% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.41 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 11.33 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.94 | 48.17 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.74 | 45.13 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 310.97 | 113.52 | 274% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers