Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMRX
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMRX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
Price$25.38
Change-$0.39 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.71B
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and LAMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 737B vs. LAMRX (4.71B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FXAIX (1.11) vs LAMRX (0.39). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FXAIX (15 years) vs LAMRX (18 years). LAMRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.91 vs. LAMRX (4.56). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 105.56 vs. LAMRX (46.85).
| FXAIX | LAMRX | FXAIX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.707 | 13.485 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 737B | 4.71B | 15,651% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.39 | 286% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.91 | 4.56 | 349% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.75 | 45.07 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.56 | 46.85 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 267.09 | 90.29 | 296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement