Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMHX
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMHX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$26.05
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.63B
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMHX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and LAMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. LAMHX (4.63B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: FXAIX (1.12) vs LAMHX (0.81). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMHX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMHX (10 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.93 vs. LAMHX (5.79). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.83 vs. LAMHX (54.45).
| FXAIX | LAMHX | FXAIX / LAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.832 | 13.548 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 723B | 4.63B | 15,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.81 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.93 | 5.79 | 258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.18 | 56.91 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.83 | 54.45 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 259.62 | 99.71 | 260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement