Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMAX
FXAIX vs LAMAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMAX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth A
Price$25.57
Change-$0.07 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.82B
FXAIX vs LAMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 753B vs. LAMAX (4.82B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMAX: FXAIX (1.10) vs LAMAX (0.64). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMAX: FXAIX (15 years) vs LAMAX (24 years). LAMAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMAX: FXAIX (0) vs LAMAX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. LAMAX (11.67). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 93.74 vs. LAMAX (46.81).
| FXAIX | LAMAX | FXAIX / LAMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.89 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.89 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.998 | 2.444 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 753B | 4.82B | 15,632% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.64 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 11.67 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.94 | 49.40 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.74 | 46.81 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 310.97 | 117.92 | 264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers