Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs REMCX
FWWNX vs REMCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs REMCX
American Funds New World 529-F-3
Price$97.10
Change+$0.17 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
Russell Inv Emerging Markets C
Price$18.90
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets802.63M
FWWNX vs REMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. REMCX (803M). REMCX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: REMCX (1.33) vs FWWNX (0.95). FWWNX was incepted earlier than REMCX: FWWNX (5 years) vs REMCX (27 years). REMCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.63). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FWWNX (37.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: REMCX (0) vs FWWNX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.24 vs. FWWNX (20.11). FWWNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.98 vs. REMCX (3.81).
| FWWNX | REMCX | FWWNX / REMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.19 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.31 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.910 | 30.290 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 803M | 9,377% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.33 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.11 | 28.24 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.35 | 44.61 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.98 | 3.81 | 551% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement