Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RSEAX
FWWMX vs RSEAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RSEAX
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-3
Price$66.17
Change-$1.02 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity A
Price$16.82
Change-$1.60 (-8.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.94B
FWWMX vs RSEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. RSEAX (2.94B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RSEAX: FWWMX (1.45) vs RSEAX (0.58). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RSEAX: FWWMX (5 years) vs RSEAX (14 years). RSEAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RSEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). RSEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: RSEAX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.50 vs. RSEAX (0.68). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.82 vs. RSEAX (8.97).
| FWWMX | RSEAX | FWWMX / RSEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.10 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.20 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.519 | 0.179 | 850% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 208B | 2.94B | 7,087% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.58 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.50 | 0.68 | 815% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.52 | 26.72 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.82 | 8.97 | 455% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers