Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LBWCX
FWWMX vs LBWCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LBWCX
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-3
Price$68.41
Change+$0.31 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.79
Change+$0.21 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.53M
FWWMX vs LBWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LBWCX (96.5M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: FWWMX (1.38) vs LBWCX (0.64). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LBWCX: FWWMX (5 years) vs LBWCX (15 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: FWWMX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.43 vs. LBWCX (-0.91). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 47.63 vs. LBWCX (28.72).
| FWWMX | LBWCX | FWWMX / LBWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.90 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.91 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.417 | 15.043 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209B | 96.5M | 216,580% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.64 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.43 | -0.91 | -599% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.45 | 13.09 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.63 | 28.72 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement