Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$39.38
Change+$0.20 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.38B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$73.09
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.39B
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FWWFX (3.39B). RNPFX (0.72) and FWWFX (0.69) have matching dividends . FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.15 vs. FWWFX (-0.28). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.12 vs. FWWFX (24.18).
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.161 | 17.811 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 161B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.72 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.28 | 11.15 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.60 | 62.61 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.18 | 42.12 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.57 | 113.87 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement