Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$38.18
Change+$0.25 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.24
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FWWFX (3.28B). RNPFX (0.74) and FWWFX (0.72) have matching dividends . FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.38 vs. FWWFX (5.11). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.12 vs. FWWFX (26.47).
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.713 | 14.829 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 158B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.74 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.11 | 17.38 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.65 | 45.93 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.47 | 44.12 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.45 | 88.70 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement