Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPEX
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$38.51
Change-$0.08 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$70.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWWFX (3.37B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than RNPEX: FWWFX (0.70) vs RNPEX (0.49). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). RNPEX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.69). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.55 vs. FWWFX (2.35). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 37.89 vs. FWWFX (21.28).
| FWWFX | RNPEX | FWWFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.661 | 15.367 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.49 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.35 | 13.55 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.87 | 34.29 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.28 | 37.89 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.53 | 86.53 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement