Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPFX
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$36.87
Change+$0.24 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.24
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FWTFX (3.28B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPFX (0.74) vs FWTFX (0.31). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWTFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.38 vs. FWTFX (4.16). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.12 vs. FWTFX (22.41).
| FWTFX | RNPFX | FWTFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.374 | 14.829 | 63% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 158B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.74 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | 17.38 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.67 | 45.93 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.41 | 44.12 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.34 | 88.70 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement