Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPFX
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$37.17
Change-$0.08 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWTFX (3.37B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPFX (0.74) vs FWTFX (0.30). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWTFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.98 vs. FWTFX (1.41). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.70 vs. FWTFX (17.38).
| FWTFX | RNPFX | FWTFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.264 | 15.587 | 66% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.74 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.41 | 13.98 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.05 | 35.34 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.38 | 39.70 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.27 | 89.56 | 65% |