Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPFX
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$38.88
Change-$0.05 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.53B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.71
Change+$0.38 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWTFX (3.53B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPFX (0.69) vs FWTFX (0.29). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWTFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. FWTFX (-2.28). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.98 vs. FWTFX (12.35).
| FWTFX | RNPFX | FWTFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.129 | 19.455 | 78% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.69 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.28 | 11.89 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.61 | 44.96 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.35 | 25.98 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.19 | 94.40 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement