Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPEX
FWTFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$37.17
Change-$0.08 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$70.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
FWTFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWTFX (3.37B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPEX (0.49) vs FWTFX (0.30). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWTFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.55 vs. FWTFX (1.41). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 37.89 vs. FWTFX (17.38).
| FWTFX | RNPEX | FWTFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.76 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.76 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.264 | 15.367 | 67% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.49 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.41 | 13.55 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.05 | 34.29 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.38 | 37.89 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.27 | 86.53 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement