Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPEX
FWTFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$38.88
Change-$0.05 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.53B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$73.15
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
FWTFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWTFX (3.53B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPEX (0.46) vs FWTFX (0.29). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWTFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.46 vs. FWTFX (-2.28). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 24.37 vs. FWTFX (12.35).
| FWTFX | RNPEX | FWTFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.76 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.76 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.129 | 19.127 | 79% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.46 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.28 | 11.46 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.61 | 43.85 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.35 | 24.37 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.19 | 91.31 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement