Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPCX
FWTFX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPCX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$36.46
Change-$2.43 (-6.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.58B
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$69.20
Change-$2.46 (-3.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
FWTFX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Hold and RNPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWTFX (3.58B). RNPCX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPCX (0.73) vs FWTFX (0.08). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: FWTFX (17 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). FWTFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.05). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPCX (23.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPCX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPCX (250). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.64 vs. FWTFX (3.80). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.79 vs. FWTFX (6.81).
| FWTFX | RNPCX | FWTFX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.05 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.05 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.456 | 2.848 | 121% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.58B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.73 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 12.64 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.56 | 41.30 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.81 | 16.79 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.05 | 125.63 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers