FWRG
Price
$17.24
Change
+$0.39 (+2.31%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.05B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SGLOF
Price
$17.82
Change
-$1.78 (-9.08%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FWRG vs SGLOF

Header iconFWRG vs SGLOF Comparison
Open Charts FWRG vs SGLOFBanner chart's image
First Watch Restaurant Group
Price$17.24
Change+$0.39 (+2.31%)
Volume$38.89K
Capitalization1.05B
FOOD & LIFE COS
Price$17.82
Change-$1.78 (-9.08%)
Volume$131.9K
Capitalization6.02B
FWRG vs SGLOF Comparison Chart in %
FWRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FWRG vs. SGLOF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWRG is a StrongBuy and SGLOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FWRG: $16.85 vs. SGLOF: $17.82)
Brand notoriety: FWRG and SGLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FWRG: 271% vs. SGLOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FWRG: $1.05B vs. SGLOF: $6.02B
FWRG [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.05B. SGLOF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $230.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FWRG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FWRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGLOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FWRG is a better buy in the long-term than SGLOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FWRG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FWRG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FWRG (@Restaurants) experienced а +5.12% price change this week, while SGLOF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.67% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGLOF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than FWRG($1.05B). FWRG has higher P/E ratio than SGLOF: FWRG (215.56) vs SGLOF (29.75). FWRG YTD gains are higher at: 11.737 vs. SGLOF (0.000). SGLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 64.2B vs. FWRG (93.7M). SGLOF has more cash in the bank: 49.3B vs. FWRG (20.7M). FWRG has less debt than SGLOF: FWRG (982M) vs SGLOF (217B). SGLOF has higher revenues than FWRG: SGLOF (389B) vs FWRG (1.17B).
FWRGSGLOFFWRG / SGLOF
Capitalization1.05B6.02B17%
EBITDA93.7M64.2B0%
Gain YTD11.7370.000-
P/E Ratio215.5629.75725%
Revenue1.17B389B0%
Total Cash20.7M49.3B0%
Total Debt982M217B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FWRGSGLOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FWRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCIGX37.900.31
+0.82%
Nuveen International Value C
VSCPX376.440.47
+0.13%
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
TRWFX26.80N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Equity R4
TVCFX68.74-0.06
-0.09%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core C
DFMIX35.68-0.29
-0.81%
Davidson Multi-Cap Equity I

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
+4.53%
FRSH - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
-10.60%
CAKE - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
BJRI - FWRG
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
WEN - FWRG
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
KRUS - FWRG
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.62%
More

SGLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGLOF and RSTRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGLOF and RSTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLOF
1D Price
Change %
SGLOF100%
N/A
RSTRF - SGLOF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BROS - SGLOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
MTYFF - SGLOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
FWRG - SGLOF
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.53%
MBPFF - SGLOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More