FWRG
Price
$18.59
Change
-$0.07 (-0.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
65 days until earnings call
RTBRF
Price
$1.49
Change
-$0.20 (-11.83%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
210.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FWRG vs RTBRF

Header iconFWRG vs RTBRF Comparison
Open Charts FWRG vs RTBRFBanner chart's image
First Watch Restaurant Group
Price$18.59
Change-$0.07 (-0.38%)
Volume$983.16K
Capitalization1.13B
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$1.49
Change-$0.20 (-11.83%)
Volume$913
Capitalization210.53M
FWRG vs RTBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FWRG vs. RTBRF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWRG is a Hold and RTBRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FWRG: $18.59 vs. RTBRF: $1.49)
Brand notoriety: FWRG and RTBRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FWRG: 103% vs. RTBRF: 31%
Market capitalization -- FWRG: $1.13B vs. RTBRF: $210.53M
FWRG [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.13B. RTBRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $210.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FWRG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FWRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FWRG is a better buy in the long-term than RTBRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FWRG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTBRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FWRG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RTBRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RTBRF is a better buy in the short-term than FWRG.

Price Growth

FWRG (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.33% price change this week, while RTBRF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWRG($1.13B) has a higher market cap than RTBRF($211M). FWRG has higher P/E ratio than RTBRF: FWRG (103.28) vs RTBRF (12.23). FWRG YTD gains are higher at: -0.107 vs. RTBRF (-5.096).
FWRGRTBRFFWRG / RTBRF
Capitalization1.13B211M537%
EBITDA93.7MN/A-
Gain YTD-0.107-5.0962%
P/E Ratio103.2812.23844%
Revenue773MN/A-
Total Cash19.2MN/A-
Total Debt959MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTBRF: Fundamental Ratings
RTBRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FWRGRTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGNCX14.170.12
+0.85%
Macquarie Natural Resources C
MXTFX7.18N/A
N/A
Empower Small Cap Value Instl
FAPJX13.34N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future A
PNOPX127.78-0.23
-0.18%
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
GRMAX30.18-0.09
-0.30%
Nationwide S&P 500 Index A

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with KRUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then KRUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
-0.38%
KRUS - FWRG
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
BJRI - FWRG
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
CAKE - FWRG
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
DIN - FWRG
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
RICK - FWRG
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More

RTBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTBRF and NROM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTBRF and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTBRF
1D Price
Change %
RTBRF100%
N/A
NROM - RTBRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBGI - RTBRF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - RTBRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - RTBRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
SIRZF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More